tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post189882770499526087..comments2018-02-06T23:09:43.792-08:00Comments on The Holbert Report: CSS3 Flexbox enabled in nightlies & ready for testing!Danielhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06625163638446776772noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post-61759447889940117292013-02-23T04:42:50.219-08:002013-02-23T04:42:50.219-08:00"you can use feature-detection in script"..."you can use feature-detection in script"<br /><br />Thank you for not addressing the point of my comment. The FF team should NOT be shipping the flexbox properties unprefixed unless support is complete. That's reckless and irresponsible, and they should know better.<br /><br />I should not have to resort to feature detection in JS to weed out StupidBrowserA (that's you, Firefox). I've never needed it before, and if the team had done the right thing by shipping with prefixes, all I would have to do is not use the -moz- prefix so it can gracefully fall back on the styles I've provided for non-flexbox browsers.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post-46187061813711365132013-02-22T09:29:13.034-08:002013-02-22T09:29:13.034-08:00> There's no way to differentiate
> betw...> There's no way to differentiate<br />> between the non-prefixed browsers:<br />> Opera (which supports wrapping) and<br />> Mozilla (which won't support wrapping)<br /><br />Sure there is -- you can use feature-detection in script -- see the "rolling your own chunk here:<br /> http://www.sitepoint.com/detect-css3-property-browser-support/<br />(replacing textShadow with flexWrap) <br /><br />The "@supports" feature would also make this easier, once it's implemented & turned on everywhere, FWIW.<br />http://www.sitepoint.com/supports-native-css-feature-detection/Danielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06625163638446776772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post-26885761718589219272013-02-22T07:44:10.481-08:002013-02-22T07:44:10.481-08:00It seems highly irresponsible to ship unprefixed v...It seems highly irresponsible to ship unprefixed versions of the flexbox properties when wrapping is going to be missing. There's no way to differentiate between the non-prefixed browsers: Opera (which supports wrapping) and Mozilla (which won't support wrapping). If Mozilla isn't supporting wrapping when my layout expects it, it is going to appear very wrong and in some cases, virtually unusable.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post-12614722304566586152013-01-10T19:06:30.289-08:002013-01-10T19:06:30.289-08:00@Anonymous: I can't project an exact date righ...@Anonymous: I can't project an exact date right now. Flex-wrap support is near the top of my priority queue, but not quite at the top. <br /><br />Right now, the earliest I think flex-wrap could be checked in would be the Firefox 22 timeframe -- that will be the version of our development trunk (Nightly) in just over a month, and that version will go to release in late June, per https://wiki.mozilla.org/RapidRelease/Calendar<br /><br />Sorry that it's not sooner :-(Danielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06625163638446776772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post-53540674862498402722013-01-10T09:20:16.600-08:002013-01-10T09:20:16.600-08:00Any idea when flex-wrap will be available.
I'...Any idea when flex-wrap will be available.<br /><br />I'm working on a small mobile site targeting android users (chrome & firefox) and was hoping to use flexbox.<br /><br />But I'll need flex-wrap otherwise I'll have to back to floats :(Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post-65265573925622787472012-12-08T13:29:24.023-08:002012-12-08T13:29:24.023-08:00@jet & wg9s & Ben: Thanks! :)
@Andre: I&#...@jet & wg9s & Ben: Thanks! :)<br /><br />@Andre: I'm not sure if XUL will be fully "replaced", but it is my understanding that Firefox UI will be shifting away from XUL at least in part (and perhaps entirely at some point) towards HTML layout models like flexbox and grid.<br /><br />@teoli: Thanks for that MDN link! Looks like a great introduction & resource.Danielhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06625163638446776772noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post-28940140902427013572012-12-08T13:22:00.906-08:002012-12-08T13:22:00.906-08:00This is great work Daniel :)This is great work Daniel :)Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10740054521692552815noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post-79683439166407236502012-12-08T05:07:11.622-08:002012-12-08T05:07:11.622-08:00Also note that the MDN has a tutorial on this.
htt...Also note that the MDN has a tutorial on this.<br />https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/CSS/Using_CSS_flexible_boxes<br /><br />This may be a good start, and don't hesitate to edit the page if you find any mistakes or to communicate us things that are missing from it.teolinoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post-17077760530545956902012-12-08T03:15:49.037-08:002012-12-08T03:15:49.037-08:00Cool!
Is it generally Mozilla's goal to repla...Cool!<br /><br />Is it generally Mozilla's goal to replace the XUL box model with CSS3 flex and grid?<br /><br />Will, at some point, "XUL" be "replaced" (more like re-implemented) by a web components / x-tags based implementation instead of the current XBL-based one?<br /><br />Thanks for the answersAndrenoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post-46673109940992179862012-12-07T17:25:14.309-08:002012-12-07T17:25:14.309-08:00Hmm . I see your prove I am not a robot , but if ...Hmm . I see your prove I am not a robot , but if I am a robot, then there are no instructions.<br /><br />Anyway Great work!wgianopouloshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11363090300524688034noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5541414252435605845.post-26133187418565995502012-12-07T16:47:00.825-08:002012-12-07T16:47:00.825-08:00Nice work...congratulations!Nice work...congratulations!Jet Villegashttp://www.junglecode.netnoreply@blogger.com